Đáp án & lời giải chi tiết: Đề 9Study soạn tốt nghiệp THPT môn Tiếng Anh năm 2025 - Mã đề 09

Read the following text and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the option that best fits each of the numbered blanks from 1 to 6.

Student Innovation and Systemic Change

In recent years, education systems worldwide have increasingly promoted student-led innovation—not merely in academic disciplines, but as a means of challenging structural inefficiencies in their own environments. National competitions, [1] ______ often framed as platforms for “applied creativity,” now require entrants to articulate the long-term impact and replicability of their ideas. A notable example involved redesigning school transport logistics to minimize idling time and emissions, an initiative [2] ______ with both environmental and equity goals.

High-impact submissions frequently [3] ______ patterns in community behaviour, drawing on qualitative methods such as interviews or observational logs. What distinguishes these entries is not technological complexity alone, but the strategic framing of modest insights into models with broader systemic relevance. Organizers encourage submissions from [4] ______ demographic and educational profiles and ensure that [5] ______ is unintentionally excluded during assessment. The ultimate objective is to normalise [6] ______ thinking as a foundational element of educational practice.

Read the following text and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the option that best fits each of the numbered blanks from 1 to 6.

Student Innovation and Systemic Change

In recent years, education systems worldwide have increasingly promoted student-led innovation—not merely in academic disciplines, but as a means of challenging structural inefficiencies in their own environments. National competitions, [1] ______ often framed as platforms for “applied creativity,” now require entrants to articulate the long-term impact and replicability of their ideas. A notable example involved redesigning school transport logistics to minimize idling time and emissions, an initiative [2] ______ with both environmental and equity goals.

High-impact submissions frequently [3] ______ patterns in community behaviour, drawing on qualitative methods such as interviews or observational logs. What distinguishes these entries is not technological complexity alone, but the strategic framing of modest insights into models with broader systemic relevance. Organizers encourage submissions from [4] ______ demographic and educational profiles and ensure that [5] ______ is unintentionally excluded during assessment. The ultimate objective is to normalise [6] ______ thinking as a foundational element of educational practice.

Read the following text and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the option that best fits each of the numbered blanks from 1 to 6.

Student Innovation and Systemic Change

In recent years, education systems worldwide have increasingly promoted student-led innovation—not merely in academic disciplines, but as a means of challenging structural inefficiencies in their own environments. National competitions, [1] ______ often framed as platforms for “applied creativity,” now require entrants to articulate the long-term impact and replicability of their ideas. A notable example involved redesigning school transport logistics to minimize idling time and emissions, an initiative [2] ______ with both environmental and equity goals.

High-impact submissions frequently [3] ______ patterns in community behaviour, drawing on qualitative methods such as interviews or observational logs. What distinguishes these entries is not technological complexity alone, but the strategic framing of modest insights into models with broader systemic relevance. Organizers encourage submissions from [4] ______ demographic and educational profiles and ensure that [5] ______ is unintentionally excluded during assessment. The ultimate objective is to normalise [6] ______ thinking as a foundational element of educational practice.

Read the following text and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the option that best fits each of the numbered blanks from 1 to 6.

Student Innovation and Systemic Change

In recent years, education systems worldwide have increasingly promoted student-led innovation—not merely in academic disciplines, but as a means of challenging structural inefficiencies in their own environments. National competitions, [1] ______ often framed as platforms for “applied creativity,” now require entrants to articulate the long-term impact and replicability of their ideas. A notable example involved redesigning school transport logistics to minimize idling time and emissions, an initiative [2] ______ with both environmental and equity goals.

High-impact submissions frequently [3] ______ patterns in community behaviour, drawing on qualitative methods such as interviews or observational logs. What distinguishes these entries is not technological complexity alone, but the strategic framing of modest insights into models with broader systemic relevance. Organizers encourage submissions from [4] ______ demographic and educational profiles and ensure that [5] ______ is unintentionally excluded during assessment. The ultimate objective is to normalise [6] ______ thinking as a foundational element of educational practice.

Read the following text and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the option that best fits each of the numbered blanks from 1 to 6.

Student Innovation and Systemic Change

In recent years, education systems worldwide have increasingly promoted student-led innovation—not merely in academic disciplines, but as a means of challenging structural inefficiencies in their own environments. National competitions, [1] ______ often framed as platforms for “applied creativity,” now require entrants to articulate the long-term impact and replicability of their ideas. A notable example involved redesigning school transport logistics to minimize idling time and emissions, an initiative [2] ______ with both environmental and equity goals.

High-impact submissions frequently [3] ______ patterns in community behaviour, drawing on qualitative methods such as interviews or observational logs. What distinguishes these entries is not technological complexity alone, but the strategic framing of modest insights into models with broader systemic relevance. Organizers encourage submissions from [4] ______ demographic and educational profiles and ensure that [5] ______ is unintentionally excluded during assessment. The ultimate objective is to normalise [6] ______ thinking as a foundational element of educational practice.

Read the following text and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the option that best fits each of the numbered blanks from 1 to 6.

Student Innovation and Systemic Change

In recent years, education systems worldwide have increasingly promoted student-led innovation—not merely in academic disciplines, but as a means of challenging structural inefficiencies in their own environments. National competitions, [1] ______ often framed as platforms for “applied creativity,” now require entrants to articulate the long-term impact and replicability of their ideas. A notable example involved redesigning school transport logistics to minimize idling time and emissions, an initiative [2] ______ with both environmental and equity goals.

High-impact submissions frequently [3] ______ patterns in community behaviour, drawing on qualitative methods such as interviews or observational logs. What distinguishes these entries is not technological complexity alone, but the strategic framing of modest insights into models with broader systemic relevance. Organizers encourage submissions from [4] ______ demographic and educational profiles and ensure that [5] ______ is unintentionally excluded during assessment. The ultimate objective is to normalise [6] ______ thinking as a foundational element of educational practice.

Read the passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the best answer to each of the following questions from 7 to 14.

Intergenerational mentorship programs, uniting young and old, have galvanized Vietnam’s communities by sparking a wave of civic engagement and cross-generational collaboration. These initiatives, fueled by community-led skill-sharing, include government-backed community centers, structured mentoring pairs, organized cross-generational workshops, and coordinated volunteer networks. Additionally, they result in renewed community engagement, increased digital literacy among elders, expanded youth awareness of cultural heritage, and strengthened local social cohesion. Whence this unity? It flows from Vietnam’s 2030 social cohesion policies, where elders offer wisdom and youth share digital fluency, dismantling traditional divides. Such programs nurture a culture of reciprocity, redefining how generations connect in a rapidly modernizing nation.

At the heart of these initiatives are hybrid workshops combining heritage skills with modern competencies. A session might involve teenagers teaching elders to use online payment platforms, followed by elders guiding youth through traditional lacquer techniques. This deliberate pairing not only fosters technical proficiency but also assuages the social isolation that once kept generations apart. In some provinces, participants collaborate on environmental clean-ups or oral-history archives, reinforcing a sense of shared purpose. The emphasis on joint problem-solving means both age groups leave with broadened skill sets and greater mutual respect.

These intergenerational initiatives, including the workshops themselves, the community centers that host them, and the volunteer teams that coordinate outreach, face inconsistent attendance, uneven recruitment, and limited staffing — they confront logistical barriers that are especially severe in rural areas, where internet access and transportation are unreliable. Cultural hesitance adds another layer of difficulty, as generational divides persist unless education actively bridges them.

Intergenerational mentorship is steadily strengthening Vietnam’s social fabric, with several communities now thriving through shared learning and cross-generational cooperation. This progress, propelled by recent policy reforms, could stall without broader resources and improved infrastructure, especially in underserved regions. Yet, if investment remains consistent and support expands nationwide, these programs have the potential to unite a majority of Vietnamese by 2035. Such an achievement would reflect not only technological and policy success, but also a national commitment to building a future founded on mutual respect and inclusion.

Read the passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the best answer to each of the following questions from 7 to 14.

Intergenerational mentorship programs, uniting young and old, have galvanized Vietnam’s communities by sparking a wave of civic engagement and cross-generational collaboration. These initiatives, fueled by community-led skill-sharing, include government-backed community centers, structured mentoring pairs, organized cross-generational workshops, and coordinated volunteer networks. Additionally, they result in renewed community engagement, increased digital literacy among elders, expanded youth awareness of cultural heritage, and strengthened local social cohesion. Whence this unity? It flows from Vietnam’s 2030 social cohesion policies, where elders offer wisdom and youth share digital fluency, dismantling traditional divides. Such programs nurture a culture of reciprocity, redefining how generations connect in a rapidly modernizing nation.

At the heart of these initiatives are hybrid workshops combining heritage skills with modern competencies. A session might involve teenagers teaching elders to use online payment platforms, followed by elders guiding youth through traditional lacquer techniques. This deliberate pairing not only fosters technical proficiency but also assuages the social isolation that once kept generations apart. In some provinces, participants collaborate on environmental clean-ups or oral-history archives, reinforcing a sense of shared purpose. The emphasis on joint problem-solving means both age groups leave with broadened skill sets and greater mutual respect.

These intergenerational initiatives, including the workshops themselves, the community centers that host them, and the volunteer teams that coordinate outreach, face inconsistent attendance, uneven recruitment, and limited staffing — they confront logistical barriers that are especially severe in rural areas, where internet access and transportation are unreliable. Cultural hesitance adds another layer of difficulty, as generational divides persist unless education actively bridges them.

Intergenerational mentorship is steadily strengthening Vietnam’s social fabric, with several communities now thriving through shared learning and cross-generational cooperation. This progress, propelled by recent policy reforms, could stall without broader resources and improved infrastructure, especially in underserved regions. Yet, if investment remains consistent and support expands nationwide, these programs have the potential to unite a majority of Vietnamese by 2035. Such an achievement would reflect not only technological and policy success, but also a national commitment to building a future founded on mutual respect and inclusion.

Read the passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the best answer to each of the following questions from 7 to 14.

Intergenerational mentorship programs, uniting young and old, have galvanized Vietnam’s communities by sparking a wave of civic engagement and cross-generational collaboration. These initiatives, fueled by community-led skill-sharing, include government-backed community centers, structured mentoring pairs, organized cross-generational workshops, and coordinated volunteer networks. Additionally, they result in renewed community engagement, increased digital literacy among elders, expanded youth awareness of cultural heritage, and strengthened local social cohesion. Whence this unity? It flows from Vietnam’s 2030 social cohesion policies, where elders offer wisdom and youth share digital fluency, dismantling traditional divides. Such programs nurture a culture of reciprocity, redefining how generations connect in a rapidly modernizing nation.

At the heart of these initiatives are hybrid workshops combining heritage skills with modern competencies. A session might involve teenagers teaching elders to use online payment platforms, followed by elders guiding youth through traditional lacquer techniques. This deliberate pairing not only fosters technical proficiency but also assuages the social isolation that once kept generations apart. In some provinces, participants collaborate on environmental clean-ups or oral-history archives, reinforcing a sense of shared purpose. The emphasis on joint problem-solving means both age groups leave with broadened skill sets and greater mutual respect.

These intergenerational initiatives, including the workshops themselves, the community centers that host them, and the volunteer teams that coordinate outreach, face inconsistent attendance, uneven recruitment, and limited staffing — they confront logistical barriers that are especially severe in rural areas, where internet access and transportation are unreliable. Cultural hesitance adds another layer of difficulty, as generational divides persist unless education actively bridges them.

Intergenerational mentorship is steadily strengthening Vietnam’s social fabric, with several communities now thriving through shared learning and cross-generational cooperation. This progress, propelled by recent policy reforms, could stall without broader resources and improved infrastructure, especially in underserved regions. Yet, if investment remains consistent and support expands nationwide, these programs have the potential to unite a majority of Vietnamese by 2035. Such an achievement would reflect not only technological and policy success, but also a national commitment to building a future founded on mutual respect and inclusion.

Read the passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the best answer to each of the following questions from 7 to 14.

Intergenerational mentorship programs, uniting young and old, have galvanized Vietnam’s communities by sparking a wave of civic engagement and cross-generational collaboration. These initiatives, fueled by community-led skill-sharing, include government-backed community centers, structured mentoring pairs, organized cross-generational workshops, and coordinated volunteer networks. Additionally, they result in renewed community engagement, increased digital literacy among elders, expanded youth awareness of cultural heritage, and strengthened local social cohesion. Whence this unity? It flows from Vietnam’s 2030 social cohesion policies, where elders offer wisdom and youth share digital fluency, dismantling traditional divides. Such programs nurture a culture of reciprocity, redefining how generations connect in a rapidly modernizing nation.

At the heart of these initiatives are hybrid workshops combining heritage skills with modern competencies. A session might involve teenagers teaching elders to use online payment platforms, followed by elders guiding youth through traditional lacquer techniques. This deliberate pairing not only fosters technical proficiency but also assuages the social isolation that once kept generations apart. In some provinces, participants collaborate on environmental clean-ups or oral-history archives, reinforcing a sense of shared purpose. The emphasis on joint problem-solving means both age groups leave with broadened skill sets and greater mutual respect.

These intergenerational initiatives, including the workshops themselves, the community centers that host them, and the volunteer teams that coordinate outreach, face inconsistent attendance, uneven recruitment, and limited staffing — they confront logistical barriers that are especially severe in rural areas, where internet access and transportation are unreliable. Cultural hesitance adds another layer of difficulty, as generational divides persist unless education actively bridges them.

Intergenerational mentorship is steadily strengthening Vietnam’s social fabric, with several communities now thriving through shared learning and cross-generational cooperation. This progress, propelled by recent policy reforms, could stall without broader resources and improved infrastructure, especially in underserved regions. Yet, if investment remains consistent and support expands nationwide, these programs have the potential to unite a majority of Vietnamese by 2035. Such an achievement would reflect not only technological and policy success, but also a national commitment to building a future founded on mutual respect and inclusion.